The American Church and Individualism
Posted by BryanMar 3
This blog post is a look at a pervasive theme in American culture that has crept into the Church at large. I am not saying this is true of every church that gathers for worship in the United States, but is something that I have noticed is a particular struggle of ours. By ours, I am placing myself squarely in my own sights.
The idea of individualism permeates American culture, if indeed we can summarize only one collective culture. Many of us dream of being the hero- the person who takes an impossible situation on our own back, beat the odds, and win the acclaim of those we save. We stress self-reliance. We relish independence. We promote our own agenda above that of others. We look out for number one, as they say. Unfortunately, this ideology also permeates the American Church.
Many people who attend worship services go from one congregation to another with reasons ranging from not getting anything out of the teaching to not liking the music. Certainly, there are times when one should leave a congregation, such as when they stray from biblical truth. Most of the time, however, the reasons are less than valid. They are symptoms of a bigger problem: we have fostered a consumer attitude towards Christianity. We ask, “what do I get out of the service?” but rarely do we ask, “what am I to give to the body of Christ?”
Before I go any further with this, I do want to emphasize that there is a personal, individual component to Christianity. Certainly, justification is a personal event. Paul is able to say that “My old self has been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. So I live in this earthly body by trusting in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.”1 We must be careful, in challenging individualism, that we don’t swing the pendulum too far in the opposite direction. With that said, let’s move on to look at some instances where the Scripture does de-emphasize the concept of individualism.
The Church
The idea of the “church” in the Scripture is never one of a building. Instead, the word translated “church”2 is used of a group of people, and can be translated “assembly” or “congregation.” In Louw and Nida’s lexicon, the word is found under the semantic domain “Groups and Classes of Persons and Members of Such Groups and Classes.” It underscores a collection of people. The word is used in two ways. One is in a universal sense- the totality of all who have ever or will ever find saving faith in Jesus Christ.3. This use is rare. The overwhelming use of the word is in a local context, where believers gather together for worship, preaching, and the administration of sacraments (or ordinances, if you prefer).4. It is a local expression of the universal Church. It speaks to the idea of corporate unity. By using the term “church,” the Holy Spirit and NT authors address believers primarily as this corporate unity.
The Body
One of Paul’s strongest metaphors for how the local expression should interact with one another is that of a “body.” Interestingly enough, the body metaphor is an argument against individualism and the attitude of dependance. This metaphor is expounded in 1 Corinthians 12, where, after discussing the gifts that the Spirit gives to the Church, Paul states:
“For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and mall were made to drink of one Spirit. “5
He then unpacks this statement by describing how it is exactly that we are “one body:” A body is not just one part, but many parts, that act and interact together to accomplish feats and works. The foot is useless by itself, as is the leg, the eyes, etc. But put them all together, and we get movement- directed and purposeful movement- but each part must rely on the others. There is no room for “look out for number 1″ in the body. Paul then tells us, “Now qyou are the body of Christ and individually rmembers of it. “6 Again, we enter this body through a personal faith, and an individual baptism, but it is an entrance into a corporate whole. As individuals, we each bring our gifts in order that the whole may function as it should. Individualism leaves us as merely a dismembered body.
One Another Commands
In order to emphasize the importance of community, sometimes people will speak of “one anothering.” This is shorthand for referencing the various verses that speak of our interactions with one another in the body. Tonight, I fired up Accordance, and put a search to find every occurrence of an author commanding us to do something with or to “one another.” It brought up 24 occurrences.7. This search brought up several instances where we are called to greet one another, love one another, wait on one another, and encourage one another. This verse doesn’t exhaust the “one anothers,” though, as it leaves out other verses such as Jesus’ words that we “should love one another”8 Neither does it show us Paul’s encouragement to “not pass judgment on one another.”9 We are to care for one another10 and motivate one another 11. The question that hangs before us is this: How can we fulfill the “one anothers,” if we are so entrapt by the chains of Individualism? Of course, we can’t.
But isn’t that what we do? We go to a worship service, wondering how the music will make us feel today, what will we learn from the preaching, if we’ll be moved by the prayers. My challenge for this coming Sunday, for those who choose to accept it: let the only “me” this sunday be, “what can I do for the body that I have found myself journeying with?” What gifts have you been withholding from the body? What other ways can you “love, greet, motivate, care for, and encourage” all the rest of the “one anothers?” How can you enhance another brother or sister’s worship experience?
How can you serve?
- Gal 2:20, NLT ↩
- ἐκκλησία, ekklēsia ↩
- Cf. Matthew 16:18, Ephesians 5:25 ↩
- Cf. 1 Cor 1:2, among many others. ↩
- 1 Cor 12:13, ESV ↩
- 1 Cor 12:27 ↩
- If you have Accordance, and are interested in searching for this, I used the following search: {VERB second imperative} αλληλων The { bracket must be a square bracket. I am unable to put it that way because my footnote plugin utilizes square brackets. ↩
- John 13:34. “Love” here is in the subjunctive mood. ↩
- Romans 14:13, in regards to secondary convictions. ↩
- 1 Cor 12:25 ↩
- Heb 10:24 ↩





9 comments
Comment by Derek on March 4, 2009 at 12:09 am
interesting to hear thoughts such as these from you, bryan. seems i was thinking along very similar lines a few years back when i wrote a couple short essays on the nature of the Church at large and within America. So long as consumerism is the modus operandi in church and in the home, Christianity is going to taste very pasty.
read my thoughts, if you like, here: http://oceanorchestra.vox.com/library/post/regurgitating-old-ideas.html
Comment by Bill on March 4, 2009 at 6:20 pm
Great thoughts about a huge problem that is very real. My feeling is that the whole “sit and listen, come to receive” mentality is tacitly prescribed by the way the worship “service” is arranged. The medieval mass was “come get the cookie”. The protestant service is based on that, with some changes. Changing the name to “celebration” doesn’t change what it actually is, either.
I love your last question, but how far does it stretch? Can I serve by doing menial tasks? Ushering, handing out communion? Or can I serve Jesus Christ TO the rest of the body? Can I serve as in minister during the meeting?
I think we’re so afraid of what some numbskulls might say that we mute the larger mouth of Jesus Christ. At least, so do 99% of sunday gatherings I’ve ever seen.
Thanks for posting on this important topic. Pluralism is needed. Making it practical? Aye, there’s the rub.
Comment by Bryan on March 4, 2009 at 8:16 pm
Bill-
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. It is precisely the more menial tasks that most congregations need- ushering, cleaning the toilets, taking out the trash, preparing the elements of communion, etc. The things that most people think they are “above.” If there is a parking spot that collects puddles of water- park there so others don’t have to. For that matter, park as far away as possible so others don’t have to walk as far. Not only do we need incarnational ministry to the neighborhood- we need it in the church itself. Good word, brother.
Comment by Hannah on March 4, 2009 at 10:21 pm
whoa, new blog theme. hadn’t seen your posts outside of my reader in awhile, apparently.
Anyway, this post makes me sad that I won’t be with our body this coming Sunday morning. worshiping in my car just isn’t the same. I hope to be able to make the evening service on my way back into town to keep up with the series [and get to worship with the larger Sojourn body that I don't often see], but am bummed to not get to serve in the morning. It’s amazing how the Spirit can build in us a love for the body where there wasn’t one before : )
Comment by Bryan on March 4, 2009 at 10:25 pm
Hey Hannah- I just changed it today, so don’t feel too bad! It will be an ongoing change, as I don’t have a ton of time to mess around with it.
I totally agree with you- only God can take a group of people, whose only point of similarity is the sacred confession, and bring them to love one another. Matt Chandler had an awesome sermon on this a while back. By the way, where will you be this weekend? You, Samantha, and I all need to be friends again soon.
Comment by Hannah on March 4, 2009 at 10:37 pm
I’m in a wedding in Cleveland. And will also spend 12 hours in the car : ) Good thing I found some NT Wright to listen to on the way up. And yes. I have missed you both a lot this semester. Yelling hello as we cross in the hallway just doesn’t cut it.
Comment by Bill on March 5, 2009 at 11:10 am
Bryan, I think you may have misunderstood my overall comment. While no one is above taking care of important details – b/c all details are important in caring for the needs of the body during a gathering – I actually do think it’s insulting to *limit* the contribution of “laymen” to merely those things.
Talking about how important those details are doesn’t excuse the fact that “ministers” act as if they’re “above” (your word) doing such things. And what? The rest of us don’t have the ability to share Jesus Christ with the congregation?
Hope that’s more clear.
Comment by Bryan on March 6, 2009 at 11:59 am
Bill
It is, and I certainly wouldn’t want to limit it to “laymen” (a disctinction I don’t believe exists). I also agree that many times pastors and the like do assume to be “above” such things. In the whole, I would absolutely agree with your comment.
I would buffet it, however, with the recognization that not all people are called to teach or to be pastors, as I think the Biblical text is clear in saying so (Romans 15:6ff, Ephesians 4:11ff). One must be careful to not allow just anyone, in order to guard from the preaching of “some other Gospel.”
Now, let me buffet that by saying if someone says “I would like to teach” and they aren’t teaching heresy, they should teach (Romans 15:6ff). Of course we can’t make the opposite mistake: not all teaching looks the same, and it should be geared towards the person. Where I attend, we have some who act as liturgists, handling the scripture readings and expanding on the Scriptures read prior to and after the sermon. They don’t feel called to be a pastor, but they are still in a teaching role. We also have a ton of small groups that gather in homes all over the city- and are always adding new ones. Then, of course, those who want to preach, so long as they are not outside orthodoxy, should be given the chance to pursue that within the local gathering.
All this to say that I absolutely agree with you- but I also feel the tension of wanting to guard the church from error, particularly in the articulation of the Gospel itself.
Comment by Nik on March 6, 2009 at 11:48 pm
I prefer to stick with one congregation in order to make it a ‘church home’, so to speak, but must also consider the fact that by continuing with the same congregation week in and week out for decades, this could also have a negative effect, where the Christian eases into a ‘church comfort zone’ which can lead to the stagnation of spiritual growth. Perhaps this stunting of growth could be referred to as ‘church home syndrome’ – though I do not recommend medication.
By entering a new congregation – the Christian is taken out of such a ‘comfort zone’ – they are presented with new relationship challenges. Perhaps these new challenges will stimulate spiritual growth. Or the case may be that the Lord brought the Christian to this new congregation in order to teach them something new, perhaps they will then be flung into the mission field. Or some other opportunity.
Brought this up to think out of the box. Maybe such a church-hopping routine is only temporary – but necessary. And, what if a Christian decided to attend two different churches, alternating weeks – and it worked! Some musicians travel around from church to church, along with evangelists, and prophets. Maybe one day you will too.