Comments on: List of Biblioblogs Resource

By: Ted

Ted — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:23:45 +0000

I think it is interesting that “inerrancy” falls under Very Conservative.
Seems like only 200 years ago that was normative. I wonder who moved…

By: A Wrong made right - He is Sufficient

A Wrong made right - He is Sufficient — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:45:31 +0000

[...] to Bryan and John, I discovered that “He is Sufficient” had made it onto N.T. Wrong’s list [...]

By: ElShaddai Edwards

ElShaddai Edwards — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:57:52 +0000

Cool… I’ve seen Carrington referenced several times now, but hadn’t seen before. I’ve been playing around with PrimePress as well…

P.S. I see that I’ve been moved into the “Translation and Linguistics” bucket… that’s probably a better fit.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:02:15 +0000

ElShaddai
No worries about being off-topic. They actually came with the theme.

By: ElShaddai Edwards

ElShaddai Edwards — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:57:25 +0000

Yeah, I’m trying to keep both feet in the “translation and linguistics” bucket these days. And my support of (very) functional translation might not qualify me as “very conservative”!

Re: Theme. Not to go too much off-topic, but did you install the inline comments plugin or did that come with the theme?

By: Bryan

Bryan — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:27:41 +0000

ElShaddai
Yeah, I was wondering about the Judaism thing myself when I saw you. In everything but theology I might have rejected “Very Conservative” but with theology, the most I could say is that I might bleed into “fairly conservative” but mostly rest firmly in “very conservative.”

Re: Theme. Thanks, I’m really digging it as well. I figure it might stick around for awhile.

By: ElShaddai Edwards

ElShaddai Edwards — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:29:42 +0000

Interesting… I wonder how I ended up in the “Early Judaism” and “Very Conservative” categories?!

P.S. I’m digging the new theme…