<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kim Riddlebarger on the ESV Study Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/</link>
	<description>A look at theology and culture. A blog by Bryan Lilly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:54:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katagraphais.com/?p=385#comment-496</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Nathan&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Shaun&lt;/b&gt;-
Thanks for the info and attempts to help! I definitely want to check out his notes on Romans 11, though I know where he stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Nathan</b> and <b>Shaun</b>-<br />
Thanks for the info and attempts to help! I definitely want to check out his notes on <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Romans+11" class="bibleref" title="NLT Romans 11" target="_new">Romans 11</a>, though I know where he stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Stitt</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Stitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katagraphais.com/?p=385#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the online version is great. Can cut and paste, and the digital text links are really nice too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the online version is great. Can cut and paste, and the digital text links are really nice too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Tabatt</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Tabatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katagraphais.com/?p=385#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Nick beat me to it.  ;)  Glad you got your answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick beat me to it.  <img src='http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Glad you got your answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan W. Bingham</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan W. Bingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katagraphais.com/?p=385#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Bryan:

Some more of Schreiner’s notes can be found at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reformationtheology.com/2008/10/post_4.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reformation Theology&lt;/a&gt;.  They didn&#039;t post Romans 2 so I am glad Nick did, but they posted his notes on Romans 9 and 11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan:</p>
<p>Some more of Schreiner’s notes can be found at <a href="http://www.reformationtheology.com/2008/10/post_4.php">Reformation Theology</a>.  They didn&#8217;t post <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Romans+2" class="bibleref" title="NLT Romans 2" target="_new">Romans 2</a> so I am glad Nick did, but they posted his notes on <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Romans+9" class="bibleref" title="NLT Romans 9" target="_new">Romans 9</a> and 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katagraphais.com/?p=385#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Awesome, Thanks Nick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, Thanks Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Norelli</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanlilly.com/oldblog/index.php/2008/10/20/kim-riddlebarger-on-the-esv-study-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Norelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katagraphais.com/?p=385#comment-487</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Bryan&lt;/b&gt;: Sure, here&#039;s the notes in question:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Rom. 2:6–11 Paul establishes the principle that judgment is according to . . . works. The structure of the passage is clear. Verse 6 enunciates the principle. Verses 7–10 work it out more specifically with an ABBA pattern (a chiasm). Verse 11 then explains why God judges according to works (because he is impartial). When Paul speaks of those who are rewarded for doing good works (vv. 7, 10), is he speaking hypothetically or of real obedience? The hypothetical view fits with the theme of the section as a whole (1:18–3:20), where all are condemned for sin, and righteousness does not come by works of law. It seems more likely, however, that Paul is speaking here of real obedience that is rewarded on the last day—such obedience being the result of the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit, as Paul explains at the conclusion of the chapter (2:26–29). Impartiality in judgment (v. 11) is a regular requirement in the OT (see Deut. 1:17; 16:18–20), reflecting the righteousness of God&#039;s judgment (Deut. 10:17).&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Bryan</b>: Sure, here&#8217;s the notes in question:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Rom.+2" class="bibleref" title="NLT Rom 2" target="_new">Rom. 2</a>:6–11 Paul establishes the principle that judgment is according to . . . works. The structure of the passage is clear. Verse 6 enunciates the principle. Verses 7–10 work it out more specifically with an ABBA pattern (a chiasm). Verse 11 then explains why God judges according to works (because he is impartial). When Paul speaks of those who are rewarded for doing good works (vv. 7, 10), is he speaking hypothetically or of real obedience? The hypothetical view fits with the theme of the section as a whole (1:18–3:20), where all are condemned for sin, and righteousness does not come by works of law. It seems more likely, however, that Paul is speaking here of real obedience that is rewarded on the last day—such obedience being the result of the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit, as Paul explains at the conclusion of the chapter (2:26–29). Impartiality in judgment (v. 11) is a regular requirement in the OT (see <a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Deut.+1%3A17" class="bibleref" title="NLT Deut 1:17" target="_new">Deut. 1:17</a>; 16:18–20), reflecting the righteousness of God&#8217;s judgment (<a href="http://biblegateway.com/bible?version=51&amp;passage=Deut.+10%3A17" class="bibleref" title="NLT Deut 10:17" target="_new">Deut. 10:17</a>).</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
